Stacking of cardboard boxes in the living while moving house. House moving service. New home owner.

(NewsNation) — Migration patterns have shifted significantly in recent years, according to a recent report.

Storage Café, an online platform that provides storage unit listings across the nation, found that the United States’ Mountain West region has became “a magnet” for Americans seeking to move.

Idaho topped the list with the highest net migration per capita. For every 1,000 people living in Idaho, approximately 25 new people moved there in 2021.

10 cities with the most ‘affordable’ mansions in the US

That’s five times more new people, per capita, moving compared to what Texas experienced in the same year. Vermont, Montana, South Carolina, Nevada and Arizona were other states that also experienced migration popularity in 2021.

Meanwhile, Alaska, New York, Illinois and California continued to lose residents, each experiencing double-digit negative net migration.

“The main reasons people move have always been strongly connected to the job and housing markets. The post-pandemic period is no exception, and it only amplified what most people already had on their checklists,” Storage Café author Maria Gatea said.

Doug Ressler of the real estate site Yardi Matrix said that remote work has become a significant factor in shaping current housing preferences.

“On the one hand, you have the aging millennials who are in prime homebuying years and seek more relaxed surroundings. For those spending more time at home, amenities such as a dedicated home office and a larger yard are increasingly desirable, which oftentimes means relocating farther away from busy urban hotspots. This is one of the main drivers of the massive flow to less densely populated locations like Idaho and Maine. Of those who moved from California to Idaho, for instance, 16% are working from home,” Ressler said.

He also noted that there are younger millennials and Gen Z who value an active social life, and they’re willing to compromise on living space.

“Developers are delivering apartments with a single bedroom and a den, or which have a small footprint but come with more expansive common areas. Working-from-anywhere in this case translates into urban-to-urban moving routes, often from former epicenters like San Francisco and San Jose to places that are still brimming with opportunities at a slightly lower cost of living, like Austin, Texas.” he added.

The post Why are so many individuals transferring to Idaho? appeared first on DAILY SAN FRANCISCO BAY NEWS.

California used to be the land of opportunity. For years, Americans dreamed of moving to the best coast to enjoy the ocean, mountains, and the indescribable California Dream. Today, that dream has become a nightmare as more Californians leave their native land, moving to Idaho and other less liberal states.

But is it just politics that is driving folks away from California? We recently found out from Californians who’ve moved to Idaho why they left the once golden state.

We looked at how much you would pay for a cheap or expensive meal. In Idaho, a fast-food meal costs around nine dollars. In California, you’ll pay at least a dollar more—the more expensive the meal, the higher the taxes. The cost of eating out in California is almost twenty-five percent higher than food in the Gem State.

We continue to see the reports night after night of massive mobs of looters robbing stores from San Francisco to Los Angeles. The police are restrained from arresting folks; if they do, they’re let out without having to post bail. Carjacking and home burglaries, along with the continued homeless situation, make living in California a challenge at best.

In Idaho, our crime rate is low. Idahoans respect law enforcement and folks who are put in jail who commit crimes. Like California, Idaho has a homeless issue, but no one lives on the streets in Boise, Meridian, or Nampa.

It’s not unusual for Californians to spend up to four hours a day in their cars commuting to and from work. Idaho’s traffic is miniscule compared to the enormous cities in California.

8 Reasons Why Idaho Continues To Feel More Like California

These 8 reasons are why I feel like the Boise area continues to feel like California.

Gallery Credit: Kyle Matthews

California in the Top 5 Places Where People from Idaho Move to

Gallery Credit: Parker Kane

Take a Look at the 12 California Cities Sending the Most People to Boise

Our sources include Neighborhood Scout, which uses FBI crime data or their safety rankings, the American Census Bureau, BestPlaces.net, Niche.com, which allows current and former residents to grade their state/city/town and Realtor.com. Crime Index means the city is safer than (X)% of cities in America. 

Gallery Credit: Michelle Heart

The post The Prime 3 Causes Californians Are Transferring to Idaho appeared first on DAILY SAN FRANCISCO BAY NEWS.

How many times have you heard someone use the adage “If you don’t like it here, leave?” Some people are fed up with the Boise area and are doing exactly that. 

We believe in transparency, so this author will admit that she’s not originally from Idaho. She grew up in a depressed steel town in Northeast Ohio and spent her entire life there until she graduated from college. Right after graduation, her first full-time job opportunity came from a radio station in Boise. She fell in love with the city immediately because it was everything her hometown wasn’t. That was over 13 years ago. So for us, it’s hard to picture packing up all your belongings and waving goodbye to the City of Trees forever. 

But we’re not naive. We see folks posting about moving out of Boise and sometimes out of the state on social media every day. Some feel that they’ve reached the end of the line when it comes to career advancement and are searching for higher-paying jobs elsewhere. Others dream of homeownership and are tired of waiting for the Boise housing market to soften. Some moved to Boise without researching its climate and realized that maybe they weren’t built for the high desert, after all. Others are underwhelmed by more restrictive healthcare decisions the state legislature decided to make for everyone. The reasons are all over the board and vary from person to person. 

So where are people moving to when they leave Boise? Last year, Stacker dug through US Census Bureau data to piece the puzzle together. Since they published their list, more recent data became available. We’ve updated the list and included some factors that may influence someone’s decision to move: earning opportunities, housing prices, weather and crime rates. 

Here’s a glimpse at what we learned by combing through the new data. At least two of these cities were not Top 15 destinations when Stacker did their first go around. 

Boise Residents Are Abandoning the Treasure Valley for These 15 Appealing Cities

In 2022, Stacker put together a list of metros people from Boise were moving to based on information collected from the U.S. Census Bureau. Their information was from the “Metro Area-to-Metro Area Migration” data set from 2015-2019. A newer set for the years 2016-2020 is now available, so re-ranked the list and updated the information about the following cities using the most current data available from each of our sources.

KEEP READING: Take a Look at the 12 California Cities Sending the Most People to Boise

Our sources include Neighborhood Scout, which uses FBI crime data or their safety rankings, the American Census Bureau, BestPlaces.net, Niche.com, which allows current and former residents to grade their state/city/town and Realtor.com. Crime Index means the city is safer than (X)% of cities in America. 

The 10 Most Popular Vacation Destinations from the Boise Airport

The post The place Folks from Boise, Idaho Are Transferring to the Most appeared first on DAILY SAN FRANCISCO BAY NEWS.

How many times have you heard someone use the adage “If you don’t like it here, leave?” Some people are fed up with the Boise area and are doing exactly that. 

We believe in transparency, so this author will admit that she’s not originally from Idaho. She grew up in a depressed steel town in Northeast Ohio and spent her entire life there until she graduated from college. Right after graduation, her first full-time job opportunity came from a radio station in Boise. She fell in love with the city immediately because it was everything her hometown wasn’t. That was over 13 years ago. So for us, it’s hard to picture packing up all your belongings and waving goodbye to the City of Trees forever. 

But we’re not naive. We see folks posting about moving out of Boise and sometimes out of the state on social media every day. Some feel that they’ve reached the end of the line when it comes to career advancement and are searching for higher-paying jobs elsewhere. Others dream of homeownership and are tired of waiting for the Boise housing market to soften. Some moved to Boise without researching its climate and realized that maybe they weren’t built for the high desert, after all. Others are underwhelmed by more restrictive healthcare decisions the state legislature decided to make for everyone. The reasons are all over the board and vary from person to person. 

So where are people moving to when they leave Boise? Last year, Stacker dug through US Census Bureau data to piece the puzzle together. Since they published their list, more recent data became available. We’ve updated the list and included some factors that may influence someone’s decision to move: earning opportunities, housing prices, weather and crime rates. 

Here’s a glimpse at what we learned by combing through the new data. At least two of these cities were not Top 15 destinations when Stacker did their first go around. 

Boise Residents Are Abandoning the Treasure Valley for These 15 Appealing Cities

In 2022, Stacker put together a list of metros people from Boise were moving to based on information collected from the U.S. Census Bureau. Their information was from the “Metro Area-to-Metro Area Migration” data set from 2015-2019. A newer set for the years 2016-2020 is now available, so re-ranked the list and updated the information about the following cities using the most current data available from each of our sources.

KEEP READING: Take a Look at the 12 California Cities Sending the Most People to Boise

Our sources include Neighborhood Scout, which uses FBI crime data or their safety rankings, the American Census Bureau, BestPlaces.net, Niche.com, which allows current and former residents to grade their state/city/town and Realtor.com. Crime Index means the city is safer than (X)% of cities in America. 

The 10 Most Popular Vacation Destinations from the Boise Airport

The post The place Folks from Boise, Idaho Are Shifting to the Most appeared first on DAILY SAN FRANCISCO BAY NEWS.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday significantly weakened a landmark water pollution law by ruling that an Idaho couple’s property does not include wetlands that are subject to federal oversight by law.

The ruling, in which all judges agreed on the outcome but differed on the legal reasoning, concluded that Mike and Chantell Sackett’s land does not fall under the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act of 1972 and therefore they do not qualify for federal approval need to build property on it.

The decision ends a year-long battle between the Sacketts and the federal government and is a victory for conservative groups and business interests opposed to full application of the Water Pollution Act.

President Joe Biden criticized the decision, saying it “turns on its head the legal framework that has protected American waters for decades.” The ruling “contradicts the science that affirms the critical role of wetlands in protecting our nation’s streams, rivers and lakes from chemicals and pollutants,” he said in a statement.

Damien Schiff, the Sacketts’ attorney, said the decision “resets the scope of the Clean Water Act to its original and reasonable limits.” The decision represents a “profound victory for property rights and the constitutional separation of powers,” he added.

The ruling is another example of the court’s conservative judges pushing ahead with a ruling that limits the sweeping powers of federal agencies, a common theme in recent years.

Coming to its broader legal conclusion, the court ruled 5-4 in an opinion by conservative Justice Samuel Alito that the Clean Water Act’s jurisdiction extended only to wetlands that were “indistinguishable” from larger bodies of water because they would have a “continuous surface” connection.”

The wetlands on the Sacketts’ property are “distinguishable from any potentially covered body of water,” he wrote.

The ruling will ease some burdens on landowners, including big business interests, Alito said, as the law “can be sweeping to criminalize everyday activities like earth moving.”

The impact will be felt across the country, as environmental groups say millions of acres of wetlands will no longer fall under federal jurisdiction. Unless states tighten their own environmental laws, property owners will have considerable freedom to fill in wetlands without having to go through the previously required state permitting process.

Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined the court’s three Liberal Justices in rejecting the new majority test.

Recommended

“By limiting the scope of the Wetlands Act to only contiguous wetlands, the Court’s new review means that some long-regulated contiguous wetlands are no longer covered by the Clean Water Act, with significant implications for water quality and flood control across the country United States will have,” he wrote.

The court’s new approach could jeopardize both the ability to regulate the Mississippi levee system and effectively monitor the Chesapeake Bay, Kavanaugh said. Levees separating wetlands from the Mississippi mean those wetlands could be outside of federal oversight and wetlands vital to the Chesapeake Bay could be filled in without state permits, he said.

In a separate statement, Liberal Justice Elena Kagan targeted the majority to rewrite a law passed by Congress. She compared the ruling to the court’s decision last year to limit the scope of the Clean Air Act as part of efforts to tackle climate change.

“The vice is the same in both cases: the appointment of the court as the national decision-maker in environmental policy,” she said.

In this case, the Sacketts returned to the Supreme Court for the second time after the judges ruled in their favor in a previous case in 2012. Both cases involve the same underlying dispute: their desire to build a property on their property in Priest Lake, Idaho, portions of which have been designated a protected wetland area by the EPA, meaning the land is subject to federal jurisdiction and A permit is required to build on it.

Chantell and Mike Sackett.Lawrence Hurley/E&E News

The litigation focused on whether the Sacketts could challenge an EPA compliance order in court after they filled the affected area with gravel and sand without a permit. The dispute, which began in 2007, continued over whether the land was even a wetland.

The Sacketts returned to the Supreme Court after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in San Francisco, ruled in favor of the federal government in August 2021 that the area was in fact a wetland.

The law defining a wetland – which is crucial for property developers and other business interests – has long been unclear and was not resolved when the Supreme Court ruled a previous case on the issue. In 2006, four judges said the Clean Water Act covers wetlands with a “continuous surface connection” to a waterway, but there was no clear majority. Judge Anthony Kennedy, who cast the fifth vote in that 5-4 ruling, presented his own test, saying the statute provides jurisdiction over wetlands with a “significant connection” to a waterway.

Successive presidential administrations have attempted to bring clarity to the law, with Democrats generally favoring greater federal power and Republicans, supported by business interests, saying the Clean Water Act’s jurisdiction should be limited.

In Thursday’s ruling, the court rejected the significance nexus test and appeared to adopt the approach of the four-judge block in the 2006 case.

Sam Sankar, a lawyer for environmental group Earthjustice, said up to 90 million hectares of formerly protected wetlands could now be at risk.

Because liberal-leaning states are likely to enact new laws to protect wetlands, “the impacts on the ground will be most severe in states that are most polluter-friendly and least concerned about environmental protection,” he added.

While environmental activists were depressed, the business community rejoiced at a decision that will be a boon to companies across multiple industries, including energy and construction.

“The Supreme Court has given long-overdue relief to businesses and landowners across our country,” said Marty Durbin, a senior official at the US Chamber of Commerce.

The Biden administration finalized its own rule in December, largely reverting to the interpretation that existed prior to the actions of the Obama and Trump administrations, although the new rule already faced its own legal challenges. Because of the Supreme Court ruling, the EPA must now go back to the drawing board.

Lawrence Hurley reports on the Supreme Court for NBC News Digital.

The post Supreme Court docket delivers blow to wetlands protections in win for Idaho landowners appeared first on DAILY SAN FRANCISCO BAY NEWS.

Chimney sweep Grant Darrow was a major supporter of the Greater Idaho movement.Nathan VanderKlippe/The Globe and Mail

When people describe the differences between eastern and western Oregon, they often speak in colors.

The rainy green of the coast contrasts sharply with the dunes of an arid interior and its expanses of sun-bleached wheat. Then there are the political shades: the blue to the west that has kept the Democrats in office for nearly 40 years, while east of the Cascade Mountains the Republican red runs so deep that in some counties four out of five voters backed Donald Trump a year 2020

Such geographic and political divisions are rife in the US, generating a resentment and disenchantment that have fueled frustrated undercurrents from the Tea Party to Trumpism.

In eastern Oregon, a group says they have a solution: Join Idaho, one of the US’s most dependable red states, by pushing the state line far west — a sort of extreme maneuver that would redraw the national map to include the Separate citizens by their political beliefs. The Greater Idaho Movement, as it is known, proposes taking over nearly two-thirds of Oregon’s land and bringing it under Boise’s rule.

Breakaway Counties in Oregon

In eastern Oregon, 11 counties have already voted to commit to joining Idaho

counties that voted

for joining Idaho

Counties voting next

about joining Idaho

The Globe and Mail, source: majoridaho.org

Breakaway Counties in Oregon

In eastern Oregon, 11 counties have already voted to commit to joining Idaho

counties that voted

for joining Idaho

Counties voting next

about joining Idaho

The Globe and Mail, source: majoridaho.org

Breakaway Counties in Oregon

In eastern Oregon, 11 counties have already voted to commit to joining Idaho

counties that voted

for joining Idaho

Counties voting next

about joining Idaho

The Globe and Mail, source: majoridaho.org

The concept, seductive to conservatives, is among the most palpable expressions of the ill will that permeates modern US politics, even if critics dismiss it as absurd. “I’m 76 years old and if I don’t die by the time I’m 111, it won’t be done,” said Susan Roberts, a Wallowa County councilwoman who has been in politics for 40 years. “If you want to move to Idaho or Kentucky or anywhere, you can do that.”

Some in eastern Oregon counter: Why uproot yourself when you can bring Idaho to you?

The idea caught on. Eleven rural Oregon counties have already voted to begin discussions about joining Idaho. Politicians in Oregon and Idaho have prepared legislation to kick-start negotiations. Polls in both states show high levels of public support for the idea, and money is being raised to hire lobbyists.

“Time to split or succumb,” as Grant Darrow put it in a 2015 letter to the editor that helped spark the current movement. Mr. Darrow is a chimney sweep from eastern Oregon whose job once took him into homes in an area the size of New Jersey. Conversations in those living rooms, he says, prompted him to propose a change.

Matt McCaw, spokesman for the Greater Idaho movement, outside his home in Powell Butte.Nathan VanderKlippe/The Globe and Mail

“Everyone was upset about what was going on in Salem,” he said in the Oregon capital. “People were just angry.” The split from the Coastal Liberals just seemed to make sense.

“They don’t want us. We don’t want to be here,” he said. “And the people of Idaho agree with our cause.”

Idaho Republicans see the prospect of additional resources and a voting bloc that would cement their grip on an already conservative stronghold.

“We’re looking at this huge landmass over there in Oregon. Check out their resources, from water to wood to minerals. Why wouldn’t we at least have a chat?” said Barbara Ehardt, an Idaho representative who intends to draft a bill proposing a discussion about moving the state line.

In eastern Oregon, 11 counties have already voted to support a move to Idaho, pledging local commissioners to meet regularly to discuss the idea. These meetings are typically sparsely attended, and a recent drive through the region – with its wind-sculpted landscapes, mountain ranges and narrow river gorges – showed few signs of roadside support.

But complaints are widespread. People have resented elements of the state’s progressive policies, including minimum wage increases, climate-related measures, decriminalizing drug possession and more recently Measure 114, which will require new permits to buy a gun and ban the possession of magazines containing more than 10 rounds. (The measure is challenged by a lawsuit filed by Harney County, one of the 11 who voted for Greater Idaho.)

“We believe almost nothing like it on the West Side,” said Matt McCaw, a small business owner who is now a spokesman for Greater Idaho. He called state borders an imaginary line established at a very different time in history.

In 2015, Grant Darrow sent a letter to the editor proposing breaking off portions of Oregon, a notion that has become the Greater Idaho Movement today. Mr Darrow keeps the letter framed at his home in Cove.Nathan VanderKlippe/The Globe and Mail

Today, “where the state line runs makes no sense in this state. Because it’s not where the cultural, political and economic divide is.”

The pandemic in particular has roused dissatisfaction. “People in eastern Oregon didn’t like the lockdown,” McCaw said. “And it was forced upon us by the west side of the state.”

History, supporters say, is on their side. Other borders have been shifted, albeit slightly, in recent decades following an agreement between two states. The US Congress must approve such a change.

Still, no one needs to have a precise idea of ​​what Greater Idaho might cost just yet. Critics have suggested that Idaho would have to pay many billions of dollars in compensation. Proponents say the state’s eastern counties are home to 9 percent of the population, and therefore Idaho could be expected to shoulder 9 percent of the state’s debt.

Nonetheless, they say it’s much more viable than other self-government concepts like Jefferson State, an idea to create an entirely new West Coast state.

And the 11 county votes should be taken seriously, said Dennis Linthicum, an Oregon state senator.

“King George III. probably should have given it serious thought when 13 colonies pleaded for their freedom,” said Mr. Linthicum, who recently proposed legislation to open negotiations in the greater Idaho area. He calls Alberta’s recently passed sovereignty law “a bit inspiring”.

But even for him, actually redrawing the map isn’t a top priority.

“We get some conversation started and that’s the main thing,” he said. “Is it really pushing the line and that’s the be-all and end-all? I don’t believe.”

But for others, Greater Idaho’s very existence reflects a grim modern reality. Oregon author and commentator Robert Leo Heilman accuses leaders who have tracked social fractures for their own political gain.

“I blame the angry people less than the people who intentionally piss them off,” he said.

“In Dante’s Inferno, the discordants occupy the eighth ring of Hell. Just off the ground,” he added. “Hell, the lechers are on the second ring. Choose your sins wisely.”

The post Conservative Oregon counties look to shift state boundaries and be a part of reliably Republican Idaho appeared first on DAILY SAN FRANCISCO BAY NEWS.

From Soumya Karlamangla

New York Times

If the candidates fighting to succeed Gavin Newsom can agree on one thing, it is that too many Californians are fleeing the state.

At the start of her campaign, Caitlyn Jenner announced that another private plane owner was “packing up his hangar” for Arizona because he couldn’t stand to see more homeless people. Kevin Paffrath, a YouTube star who runs a Democrat, began his candidacy by giving reasons to trade “broken” California for Florida’s greener pastures.

In a recent debate, Republican candidate Kevin Faulconer said that when you name a state, Californians go there, any state.

Sure, there is some truth to what is known as the “California Exodus”: More Californians are moving to other states than from any other part of the country. But this is by no means a new trend – it has been the case for over 30 years.

And while California’s population declined slightly over the past year and the state lost a seat in Congress, it wasn’t because of sudden mass migration to states like Texas and Idaho.

Our stopped population growth was mainly due to falling birth rates and international immigration, as well as a high number of deaths from COVID-19, as reported by my colleague Shawn Hubler.

Even so, during the discussion, I wondered where Californians end up settling down when they leave. So I cracked the numbers.

More than 653,000 Californians moved to another state in 2019, while about 480,000 people moved here from other parts of the country, according to data from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. (The 2020 numbers are not available, but analysis of other 2020 datasets has produced similar results.)

These were the top destinations for Californians leaving:

• Texas (82,235 people in Texas had moved from California last year).
• Arizona (59,713).
• Nevada (47,322).
• Washington (46,791).
• Oregon (37,927).

States Where You Would Most Like To Meet A Californian:

• Nevada (three of Nevada’s 200 residents moved from California last year).
• Idaho.
• Oregon.
• Arizona.
• Hawaii.

These are the states that new Californians have moved here from most frequently:

• New York (37,567 Californians had lived in New York last year).
• Texas (37,063).
• Washington (31,882).
• Arizona (28,226).
• Nevada (26,433).

For many Californians, the high cost of living makes staying here almost impossible, experts say. The average home price in Texas is $ 329,000, less than half what it is in the Golden State, according to Redfin, a real estate brokerage firm.

Eric McGhee, a senior fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California, told me that people moving to California are more likely to have an education, job, and higher income than those who move.

That suggests that high spending is responsible for the departures, but not high taxes as some claim, he said. California tax wealthier people much higher than those on lower incomes, he said.

“If those taxes were the motivation, you’d expect wealthy people to move out,” said McGhee, citing exceptions like Elon Musk, a freshman Texan. “By and large, these are not the people who are leaving the state.”

With all of the scramble over California’s no longer booming population, there is some evidence that we actually prefer it that way.

A poll published in July by the University of California at San Diego found that a fraction of Californians believe the state would benefit from continued population growth over the next decade.

A far higher proportion – more than one in three Californians – had a different opinion: California would be better off shrinking.

This article originally appeared in the New York Times.

The post Texas? Idaho? The place Californians are shifting appeared first on DAILY SAN FRANCISCO BAY NEWS.

If the candidates fighting to succeed Gavin Newsom can agree on one thing, it is that too many Californians are fleeing the state.

At the start of her campaign, Caitlyn Jenner announced that another private plane owner was “packing up his hangar” for Arizona because he couldn’t stand to see more homeless people. Kevin Paffrath, a YouTube star who runs a Democrat, began his candidacy by giving reasons to trade “broken” California for Florida’s greener pastures.

In a recent debate, Republican candidate Kevin Faulconer said that when you name a state, Californians go there, any state.

Sure, there is some truth to what is known as the “California Exodus”: More Californians are moving to other states than from any other part of the country. But this is by no means a new trend – it has been the case for over 30 years.

And while California’s population declined slightly over the past year and the state lost a seat in Congress, it wasn’t because of sudden mass migration to states like Texas and Idaho.

Our stopped population growth was mainly due to falling birth rates and international immigration as well as a high number of deaths from Covid-19, as my colleague Shawn Hubler has reported.

Even so, during the discussion, I wondered where Californians end up settling down when they leave. So I cracked the numbers.

More than 653,000 Californians moved to another state in 2019, while about 480,000 people moved here from other parts of the country, according to data from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. (The 2020 numbers are not available, but analysis of other 2020 datasets has produced similar results.)

These were the top destinations for Californians leaving:

States Where You Would Most Like To Meet A Californian:

These are the states that new Californians have moved here from most frequently:

For many Californians, the high cost of living makes staying here almost impossible, experts say. The average home price in Texas is $ 329,000, less than half what it is in the Golden State, according to RedFin, a real estate agency.

Eric McGhee, a senior fellow at the Public Policy Institute of California, told me that people moving to California are more likely to have an education, job, and higher income than those who move.

That suggests that high spending is responsible for the departures, but not high taxes as some claim, he said. California tax wealthier people much higher than those on lower incomes, he said.

“If those taxes were the motivation, you’d expect wealthy people to move out,” said McGhee, citing exceptions like Elon Musk, a freshman Texan. “By and large, these are not the people who are leaving the state.”

With all of the scramble over California’s no longer booming population, there is some evidence that we actually prefer it that way.

A poll by UC San Diego published in July found that a fraction of Californians believe the state would benefit from continued population growth over the next decade.

A far higher proportion – more than one in three Californians – had a different view: California would be better off if it shrank.

For more:

• Elon Musk’s departure to Texas last year fueled the state’s longstanding rivalry with California. Read more from my colleagues.

• Californians are also moving within the state, mostly from urban areas to remote suburbs. Four of the ten metropolitan areas in the country with the highest percentage of supercommuters (people who travel 90 minutes or more to work in any direction) are satellites of San Francisco. See The Times’ full listing.

• The SFGate website has a whole series of people who have left the Bay Area for the South, the Pacific Northwest, or in a van. Read more under “Fluchtmarkt”.

If you’re reading a story, make it this one

On Wednesday, Texas passed the strictest abortion law in the country, banning the procedure after six weeks of pregnancy. The new regulation amounts to an almost complete ban on abortion and forces clinics to turn away women on the first day.

Read the Times article on Texas law.

Texas already had some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the country, resulting in clinic closings. Texas has about 24 abortion clinics, up from about 40 before 2013 when the state imposed a previous round of regulation.

According to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group campaigning for the right to abortion, about 3 percent of women in California live in a county without an abortion clinic. In Texas, that figure was 43 percent before the new law.

What we eat

Try this spin on a Salade Niçoise for a late summer get-together. The recipe comes from Fanny Singer, author, art critic and daughter of Alice Waters, the owner of Berkeley’s Chez Panisse.

Where are we going

For the past decade, writer Barbara Jane Reyes has taken the same road trip: from her home in the Bay Area to the Santa Cruz Mountains, down to the Monterey Peninsula, and over the Bixby Bridge to Big Sur. Read about her trip in The Times.

Tell us about the best places to visit in California. Email your suggestions to CAtoday@nytimes.com. We’ll share more in the upcoming issues of the newsletter.

Your callback questions answered

If Governor Newsom is removed, how long will the new governor be in office?

The new governor would serve for the remainder of Mr. Newsom’s term, which would last until January 2, 2023. (California has a regularly scheduled gubernatorial election next year.)

Read answers to other frequently asked questions about the California recall.

Tell us what else you want to know about the callback. Email your questions to CAtoday@nytimes.com.

And before you go, some good news

Angela Braren, 38, comes from a Christian family and mostly consists of carpenters, farmers and workers.

Gauri Manglik, 32, is a practicing Hindu from a family of doctors, business people and politicians.

The two women met two years ago at a queer party in Oakland and have been together ever since. Despite their diverse backgrounds, Manglik told the Times, “Together we will start our own family.”

The post Texas? Idaho? The place Californians Are Transferring. appeared first on DAILY SAN FRANCISCO BAY NEWS.

Hundreds of museums around the World are dedicated to people, places, things or epochs of history. This museum is dedicated to one value: the value of cleanliness. According to the Museum of Clean website, the concept of cleanliness dominates every aspect of human life, from our surroundings and environment to our mind and body.

The museum was founded by Don Aslett, who in 2006 discovered that his collection of cleaning supplies, including 250 pre-electric vacuums, had outgrown their mini-museum space next to his cleaning center, home of his cleaning company Varsity Contractors. Aslett, who has been in the cleaning industry since she was 18, has written books and lectured on various facets of cleanliness. For Aslett, the concept of cleanliness is about more than just dirt and clutter; it is a way of life and a state of mind. The museum’s Facebook page states:

“Clean will solve most of our personal problems, most of the world’s problems. Clean creates harmony, peace, security and security. Clean speaks with a clear voice that everything is in order and under control. “

Several exhibits are object-centered; Collections of tubs, brooms, washing machines, and military helmets – which, according to the museum’s website, are used by soldiers for various sanitary purposes – reveal the tools we have relied on over the centuries to keep us clean. Other exhibits are a little more conceptual; The Garage exhibit examines the harmful effects of clutter, while the Texas-sized trash can provides a visual representation of the waste problem. A replica of Noah’s Ark located at the entrance to the museum “highlights the importance of water in the cleaning profession,” according to the CleanLink website for the professional cleaning industry.

Many museum activities aim to combat what is arguably one of the greatest threats to cleanliness: children. Kids Clean World, a three-story cleanliness playground, encourages kids to get excited about everything from sweeping to recycling. In the old town exhibition, children can experience the art of cleaning through the eyes of a chimney sweep.

Since the museum opened in 2011, the cornerstone of the collection, Aslett’s vacuum collection, has grown to nearly 1,000 pieces spanning a century of cleanliness.

The post Museum of Clear – Pocatello, Idaho appeared first on DAILY SAN FRANCISCO BAY NEWS.